Solid Edge And Velocity Series

Someone once said to me that Solid Edge was the best MCAD product that you never knew. That someone was a senior executive of a brand rival to Solid Edge. Hardcore Solid Edge users have been bitching on this blog and other places for years about the lack of marketing attention that Solid Edge has been getting. One reader even asked me if I had something against Siemens since he felt I was always writing about SolidWorks or Inventor. I have even heard Siemens employees say that Solid Edge should be receiving more press than it currently does.

I find this odd because Siemens marketing itself has neglected (if I may use that word) Solid Edge for years. Even now with the new branding, Solid Edge is hidden in something abstract called Velocity Series, which by Siemen’s definition is “a comprehensive family of modular, yet integrated solutions addressing the Product Lifecycle (PLM) in the mid-market.” On the other hand, NX has its own product line. I understand that the capabilities of NX far exceed those of Solid Edge. But this is like sending the message that Solid Edge by itself cannot do much and it needs these other things in the Velocity Series portfolio to make it really useful. Nothing is further from the truth.

My point is that Solid Edge is up against brands like SolidWorks and Inventor, whose owners have left no stones unturned to let these products have their own individuality. I have absolutely nothing against creating a portfolio like Velocity series. But from a pure marketing perspective, I would expect Siemens marketing to push Solid Edge individually a little harder as well.

Imagine someone looking to move from a 2D CAD system or a low range MCAD system to a mid-range MCAD product. What does he see? He sees SolidWorks and Inventor being touted by their respective owners as individual solutions and then he sees something called Velocity Series which has PLM written all over it. Sure he may evaluate each one and test them on their merits. Or he may not. But from a purely marketing perspective, I don’t think branding Solid Edge as part of a bundle helps its image.

What’s even more ironic is that some of the important cutting edge stuff is happening in Solid Edge and not in NX. I mean Synchronous Technology was added to Solid Edge first and then bits of it were taken over to NX. I cannot disclose much about ST3 but the story continues along the same lines. I don’t expect Siemens to make Solid Edge their flag ship product. But at least I would expect them is to portray it as a strong pillar that does not need any support. Note that all this is purely about marketing and not about the capabilities of  Solid Edge.

While attending the Siemens PLM Connection in Pune I brought up this issue with a number of Siemens executives. Every single one of them was of the opinion that “more needs to be done“. I understand that cannibalization of NX is an important factor that cannot be ignored. In fact, I believe that is the only reason why Solid Edge has been given stepchild treatment for all this time. But that’s where the senior leadership should get into the act and take a look at the bigger picture. Even if seats of NX get cannibalized today, tomorrow it will be much easier to convert them from Solid Edge to NX as opposed to converting them from SolidWorks or Inventor to NX.

I am told that certain things have changed at Siemens and that I should expect to see Solid Edge to be featured more prominently. Common sense dictates that if you wanted to showcase a car you would put it in the spotlight and maybe have a couple of glamorous girls pose around it. You most definitely would not put it in a garage along with all the tools and equipment that you need to get the most out of the car and then put the spotlight on the garage building.

  • Roger

    You have just captured the essence (and folly) of Siemens marketing effort in a couple of well crafted and insightful paragraphs. They should hire you as a marketing consultant!!

  • Roger,

    I don't think they need to hire me. I am already doing this for free, remember?. 😉

  • Roger

    But if they paid you they might feel obliged to listen.

  • LOL! An excellent point.

  • Kevin Quigley

    I agree Deelip. How many people out there know that Solid Edge actually has a lower cost starter package that does part/assembly and drafting, but has all the advanced features of SolidEdge Classic (or whatever it is called now) removed. It retails for under £2k in the UK.

    Why do CAD companies like to make it hard for users to find out exactly what is on offer?

    • bates

      Hi Kevin,

      Would you be able to provide further info on what re-sellers that you know for Solid edge.  Especially for under 2k!

  • Dave Ault

    This is precisely what long time users have been livid over for years seemingly with no concern from Integraph on. I have posted repeatedly that SE is the cad backbone that all the other stuff rides on and without CAD none of the other stuff matters. I despise that stupid mindless “Velocity” ad campaign and think it is great that many of those responsible for the farce are now gone. It should most definitly be Solid Edge in big bold letters with “and the Velocity series following it in appropriate order of importance. I have been told this will change but I am still waiting to see the Solid Edge identity promoted as it should be.

    I have reason to believe it will happen though and along with the launch of ST3 expect good things for SE users in many ways. I think it was Sara Farris that wrote the article a few years back that refered to SE as the “Best Software You've Never Heard Of” in those exact words as a subtitle. As far as I can tell there is leadership at Siemens now that knows this has to change and along with ST3 and before believe it will be. We have this year the series of 18 Summit Meetings which have just started and is the first bit of proof that they are truly going to change things around.

    Very pleased to see this article RE SE as I think it reinforces what users have been saying for years.

  • Rick

    It seems that all CAD companies have very complex and proprietary pricing structures. Maybe someone can provide a price list for the various options.

    SE modeling is amazing how do they model those attractive women and render the rock concert environment?

  • Roopinder Tara

    The senior executive may have been paraphrasing “Solid Edge– the Best MCAD Program You Won't Buy,” a post by your truly over 4 years ago on CAD Insider. So we're supposed to believe that things are finally changing?

  • Pingback: Siemens PLM Leads PLM Market In India |

  • Pingback: Solid Edge SHOULD be the Best Software You Hear of. | solidedging()